I read this article the other night and it got me thinking about guilt. Here’s part of it…
We feel guilty if we don’t give money to the Church or spend the right amount of time in prayer. Unfortunately, many believers are driven to do these things—pray, tithe, attend church, remain sexually pure—by a rabid sense of duty.
This ought not to be. While these things are good things and goals to be sought after, and while guilt should be a natural reaction to sin from a regenerate heart, the Christian faith should never be driven by a sense of duty, guilt or entitlement. Instead, we should be driven to lives of holiness by passion—passion for God, passion for the lost, passion for the Gospel, passion for each other.
I was wondering what role you think guilt plays in your life. Is there such a thing as good guilt?
Someone told me in college there is a big difference between conviction and condemnation. I agree, but often still have a hard time telling the difference between the two in my own life. I spend a lot of time clearing the smoke around everyday ministry issues trying to make things black a white. I believe if we can change a question or issue by relieving ambiguity and creating a yes or no answer then it makes it easier to choose a side. We all have paradigms (habitual ways of thinking) that can easily control our decision making. In the case of the "Super Christian", it is easy to feel guilty and it is easy to condemn. Guilt comes natural when you miss a week of church. Condemnation is a piece of cake when you meet a homosexual for the first time. These paradigms are seemingly black and white issues.
But they are not...
I said I do spend a lot of time clearing the smoke and making grey areas black and white. But should we expect these areas to stay separated all the time? Do new situations or people create grey areas that we need to decipher?
We will talk more about this tomorrow.





